On its contract clause, Frazer said it is “simply to protect the individual events” and its brand and “bans have never been on the table”.Ĭuesports Singapore chief Chuah said that if the rules are enforced, it would severely limit the events which pool athletes can participate in, as it compels them to choose either WPA events or non-WPA ones. “There is no reason why both the pro tour and amateur game cannot co-exist,” she said. In response to ST’s queries, Frazer said Matchroom does not see itself as the new world governing body for pool, defining its role as developing professional 9-ball pool, with WPA the custodian of the amateur game. In a statement issued the same day, WPA said that no decision on restricting players taking part in non-sanctioned events has been made. This sparked a strongly worded open letter from Frazer to the players on Sept 1 insisting that they are “always welcome at our events” while accusing WPA of using “bullying tactics”. If they play in non-sanctioned events, they won’t be welcome in WPA events.” “One of the items (in the general assembly on Oct 7) will be to enforce the rules that we have with players. So, countries will be facing these kinds of things if they support non-sanctioned events. In a podcast in August, Singh acknowledged Matchroom has excelled at promoting and marketing pool, but accused it of wanting to replace WPA and also including in its player contracts a clause that allows it to dictate where they can or cannot play.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |